Independent Journalism, Freedom, and Accountability is Patriotic

Vintage typewriter machine on writers desk
Vintage typewriter machine on writers desk, top view flat lay conceptual image for blogging, publishing, journalism or poetry writing.

This year The Montana Post is on track to break 1 million visits.

April of 2020 was the busiest month in the history of the blog – stretching back to 2005.

In 2020 so far the writers of this blog have shared stories, scandals, opinions, and political scoops that were only marginally (if at all) covered by the press establishment in Montana.

The Montana Post will continue to hold Daines accountable for voting NO on important emergency benefits for Montanans during a pandemic, and then taking ALL of the credit in his newsletters, tele-town halls, and vomiting out his “accomplishments” any time a microphone is placed in his vicinity. Our 2020 Senate coverage is here.

The Montana Post now offers Podcast interviews with candidates – a new feature for our readership who prefers digesting news in another format. Plus these frank conversations with candidates help each and every Montanan become a more informed voter. If you prefer to read these interviews, transcripts are available here.

When the majority of newsrooms in Montana were furloughing reporters due to economic pressures and health/safety concerns with COVID-19, The Montana Post continually provided think pieces, critical thought on COVID-19 conspiracy theories, political coverage, and more. Our Coronavirus-specific coverage from a political and social angle.

Holding politicians accountable to voters is patriotic. Being fully engaged in your democracy is your patriotic duty. Independent news sources like The Montana Post are an important voice not controlled by shareholders or advertisers. There’s a powerful freedom in that independence.

So Plains Feminist, what are you getting at here?

Since I began writing for The Montana Post a year and a half ago, I’ve personally witnessed the fearless writing of my fellow columnists. I’ve also read the death threats, seen the doxxing. But those voices, while loud and obnoxious, are unequivocally drowned out by the “Thank Yous,” the private messages of gratitude and “Someone finally gets it; thank you for saying something”, the “Why is no one else writing about this”. The server space for this blog and maintenance costs money, and The Montana Post does not advertise or sell any information or data about our readers; we’re just here to keep the light shining on Democracy.

Today I’m asking you to help financially support The Montana Post.

Support us on Patreon with a monthly donation to keep the servers humming. (I support this blog’s solid work on Patreon myself).

If you prefer, you may send a check to The Montana Post, P.O. Box 386 Helena, MT 59624 to help support our efforts.

Typically our Editor handles these fundraising asks, but I chose to put myself out here and share why The Montana Post and its mission is so important to me, our way of life in Montana, and a necessary Fourth Estate that defends our democratic ideals.

I and all of our regular writers offer our deepest thanks for your support of The Montana Post (don’t tell the Editor we did this).


Cannot afford to support financially at this time, but still wish to advance quality, independent journalism? Spread the knowledge by sharing our content. Check out some ways you can amplify our content and message below.

Need a Daily Dose of The Montana Post? Follow and retweet The Montana Post or me on Twitter for snippets of political content, stories we’re researching, random Montana goodness and badness, and deep political thought that can only be expressed in GIFs and 280 characters or less.

Easier to get your dose via email? Sign up for our email digest in the sidebar. Even that service, by the way, costs $20/month. 🙂

Like us on Facebook and share our content.

If you appreciate an independent voice holding Montana politicians accountable and informing voters, and you can throw a few dollars a month our way, we would certainly appreciate it.

Subscribe to our posts

About the author

Plains Feminist

Montana and national politics from a Southeastern Montana perspective, focusing on regional activism, womxn’s issues, LGBTQ equality, education, and growth of the Democratic Party. Plains Feminist tries (sometimes fruitfully, sometimes not so much) to connect with the hard-working folks who *eek* out a living on the “not mountains” side of the state. Plains Feminist enjoys intellectual banter over coffee or beer preferably after dark. You can reach her at or on Twitter @PlainsFeminist.


Click here to post a comment

Please enter an e-mail address

  • Hi, Ms Plains Feminist, I would be interested on your views on Tara Reade’s allegations of rape by Joe Biden and also, the Democratic Party, Democrat leaders, and the press responses to all of this?

    • Mark: while your question is completely irrelevant to this post, and you’re directing the question to Plains Feminist, as a contributor at The Montana Post I’d like to offer my perspective in the hope that until there is more substance to the allegation, innuendo will cease. I do believe the investigation should continue although we may never know what really occurred.

      Tara Reade’s accusation is deeply troubling and if true, Sen. Joe Biden should never be considered for the highest office in the land. Currently, in-depth, investigative reporting by prestigious news organizations has raised inconsistencies in Ms. Reade’s testimony but has also not ruled out that the assault happened. As one reporter opined, the story is “mired in the miasma of uncertainty.” That line comes from what I believe is an extremely balanced piece from Vox:

      There are often comparisons to accusations of sexual assault occurring during Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Justice. In that case, however, there were four accusers, the lead having passed a polygraph test. Reade says she will not take a test until Biden agrees to take one. Here’s a New York Times article on the Kavanaugh accusers:

      So, I am conflicted, as women need to be heard and believed. However, at this point, a more thorough investigation needs to be completed, including more testimony under oath, before I’ll be passing judgement.

        • As long as such an investigation is conducted in as trivial and limited a fashion as they were restricted to in Kavanaugh’s case, sure – go for it.

  • I don’t think so Pete.

    The year is 2020, and ever since the 2016 election it is now standard campaign practice to make sexual allegations against candidates.

    So even if I think Biden did the act, after so much time it’s not a deal breaker for his campaign.

    There was a Dem lawyer in 2016 actively trying to hire women to accuse Trump. They even paid off a woman’s mortgage.

    I am wondering where the #meetoo crowd went though.

      • I think you agree with me for a change.

        Sexual accusations have become so common that the electorate is numbed to it.

        Especially in decades-old situations.

Latest PostCast

Support Our Work!

Subscribe Via E-mail


Which Democratic Candidate for Governor Do You Support Today?

Send this to a friend