Terrified Montana Republicans Are Melting Down Over News of a Bullock Bid for the Senate

I’ll admit it—Governor Bullock had me convinced that he was not going to run for the Senate, so much so that I started a draft of a post on Saturday making the argument that we needed to focus our energy on the other candidates in the race. But with reports from local media, the New York Times, and Politico all saying today that he’s likely to announce a bid, Montana Republicans are melting down at the prospect of a candidate who has high name recognition and the ability to raise money entering the race.

And they should be. With Senator Daines tethered to the sinking Donald Trump ever tighter every day, with Daines never having experienced a very competitive race, with Daines so terrified of Montana voters that he only interacts with them from a call center in D.C., and with national Democrats eager to flip a Senate seat, Governor Bullock would(with no slight intended to the current candidates) immediately make the race a far more competitive one.

Today’s version of the Republican hysteria is rooted in the fact that, were he to run, Bullock would be contradicting his earlier declarations that he wasn’t interested in the race. It’s a specious argument on its face, as candidates are always evaluating races and Bullock is no different: certainly, he’s had ample reason to reconsider running against Daines as the Senator has completely caved to the lawlessness of the Trump administration and seen his approval rating drop in the state. Bullock has also had time to survey the national mood to determine if this is the right time to run for the Senate.

But the Republican wailing today wasn’t just pathetic, it was incredibly hypocritical. On Facebook, they wailed that Bullock had been misleading Montanans, perhaps forgetting that Steve Daines himself has some experience with being undecided about a Senate bid.

Back in 2011, Daines announced that he was going to run for the Senate, only to retreat from the race faster than he runs from constituents when Denny Rehberg announced his bid.

In 2013, Daines was so indecisive that The Hill Reported that he was fundraising for the House and the Senate at the same time because he just couldn’t decide where he could do the most damage:

Rep. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) needs your help to win in 2014 — but it is not exactly clear which race he means.

The freshman congressman is strongly considering a run for the Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Max Baucus (D) but has made no decision yet.

In a fundraising email sent Friday, Daines did not try to pick a race. Instead, he attempted to raise money off both potential campaigns simultaneously.

So Republicans can spare us the faux outrage about Governor Bullock deciding, if he has, to enter the Senate race late.

This race isn’t going to be about who entered the race and when; nor is it going to be about what any candidate said about the race before entering. It’s going to be a referendum on a Senator who believes that serving President Trump is more important than serving Montana, that giving himself tax breaks is more important than helping Montana families, and that our country is better off when it’s riven by divisive rhetoric that only makes it more challenging for us to face the problems we must collectively solve.

This race is going to be a referendum on a Senator who thinks so little of us that he believes that political spin is more important than productive policy.

And if is, in fact, Steve Bullock he will face in the general election, Steve Daines will be confronted with a candidate who has done more for Montana in the past two weeks than Steve Daines has done in a decade.

I think—and my sources seem to agree—that Governor Bullock is going to be in this race. Much as I admire the candidates who’ve already filed and begun their campaigns, it makes total sense that Republicans are panicking today because Bullock will bring a campaign that Steve Daines has never experienced.

Hell, if Denny Rehberg scared him out of a Senate bid, what will a two-term governor do?

If you appreciate an independent voice holding Montana politicians accountable and informing voters, and you can throw a few dollars a month our way, we would certainly appreciate it.

Subscribe to our posts

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba has been writing about Montana politics since 2005 and teaching high school English since 2000. He's a former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.
His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.
In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.


Click here to post a comment

Please enter an e-mail address

  • You should have asked me.

    I knew as soon as The Great Leader, Barack Hussein Obama was in the news for trying to recruit Bullock.

    With Obama and Schumer publicly involving themselves in the race the Dems we’re trying to build on the myth of Bullocks popularity.

    Well you read it here first – Bullock is going to lose.

    Bullock has been ineffective as Governor, and if it wasn’t for the habits of Montana to give sitting Governors a second term he would be chasing ambulances in a law practice.

    Fact: Over the last 40 years Montanans have always re-elected any sitting Governor that ran for re-election.

    I will enjoy watching Bullock being embarrassed this fall.

    • E – this is YOUR opinion only, thank heaven! Facts of the matter are that Montana has historically done better under Democratic leadership – look it up! Bullock has been one of the really good ones.

      Steve Daines is spineless, and only started working for Montana when his election year came up.

  • To say Steve Bullock has done nothing as Governor is the epitome of willful ignorance. One only need look at the expansion of Medicaid as a means of saving our rural hospitals to see a major accomplishment.
    Average Montana’s must look beyond the right wing talking points and recognize that Gov Bullock is an effective public servant and could truly do good work for Montanans in the Senate. Indeed, the McConnell led Senate’s refusal to convict Trump in light of his own admission and overwhelming evidence should be enough to change anyone’s mind about running for the Senate.
    I only hope the question of why Steve Daines spent the 4th of July in Moscow is asked and someone digs into his unholy subservience to Trump. It is obvious who Steve Daines represents and it is not the average Montanan.

Latest PostCast

Support Our Work!

Subscribe Via E-mail


Which Democratic Candidate for Governor Do You Support Today?

Send this to a friend