Never miss a post. Subscribe today.

Education Featured Missoula Montana Politics The Media

Why Does the University of Montana Have $60,000 for Another Consultant? Especially This One?

If I had attended the University of Montana for more than a day and a half, I think I’d be pretty furious about the institution’s budget priorities. As a teacher who has watched the state’s flagship university ignore and mismanage recruitment of top students for years, I know I am frustrated.

And the latest decision from the University, to hire another “consultant,” is especially galling.

While there never seems to be enough money to maintain academic programs or to ensure that students in Montana are actually being recruited to attend the university, there seems to be a limitless pool of money to hire consultants and people who are asked to build “collaborative relationships around the state,” whatever the hell that means.

The latest hire, according to the Missoulian, is former Lee Enterprises publisher and vice president Mike Gulledge, who will pull down $10,000 a month to somehow help the School of Journalism and to do media work for the university.

It’s a fascinating choice. Gulledge oversaw papers in Montana while his parent company stripped them of reporters and editors across the state. As former Indy Writer Dan Brooks noted on Twitter, “Lee Enterprises laid off half its employees during Gulledge’s tenure. He shut down the Independent.”

It is hard to emphasize how insulting it must seem to those who lost their jobs under Gulledge’s leadership while he was pulling down $456,000 in salary and other compensation from Lee to see the University many attended offer him exorbitant compensation for little responsibility.  It’s probably of little comfort that Gulledge hopes to help the media recover from the “contraction” he played such an important role creating.

It also speaks clearly about the misplaced priorities at the University of Montana. You can be damn sure that no prospective student–assuming any are ever actually contacted by the University–will be drawn to campus because of this hire, especially when 58 faculty members are being cut.

UM is facing a challenging future and seems to be answering it the way Lee has answered its corporate cash crisis: rewarding layers of top administrative staff and spending precious resources on public relations rather than substance.

Deciding to spend precious resources that could be used on student recruitment, retention, or even assistance seems on someone with a nebulously defined task of massaging some public relations is yet another unforced error by a university that seems unable to stop making them.


If you appreciate an independent voice holding Montana politicians accountable and informing voters, and you can throw a few dollars a month our way, we would certainly appreciate it.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba has been writing about Montana politics since 2005 and teaching high school English since 2000. He's a former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.
His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.
In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.


Click here to post a comment

Please enter an e-mail address

  • I attended the University of Montana over 50 year by choice for its strong humanities programs as did my son and daughter in later years. I continue to be appalled by the past and present decisions administration has made. But is is very frustrating that the new President of the University also is going down the same road as the former president. Cutting educational staff while hiring more high paying administration staff. I doubt Mike Gulledge is going to hit the road to meet up with those high school seniors in Ekalaka to Eureka to convince them to attend the once great Liberal Arts School in Missoula.

    • Yeah, somehow I suspect the engagement with high school journalism students will look a lot like the current UM efforts to recruit in-state students.

      It’s astonishing to me that they’re not even trying to reach these kids.

Send this to a friend