While Senator Daines, Representative Zinke, and the most indecisive gubernatorial candidate of all time have been trumpeting the questionable results of a Northwestern Energy-funded study that predicted dire outcomes for the state if the most drastic implementation of the Clean Power Plan were followed in Montana, they’ve been awfully quiet about another study that shows Montana’s economy will suffer if we don’t do something about global warming.
According to research by Thomas Power, failure to rein in global warming will conservatively cost the state over a billion dollars and as many as 36,000 jobs:
As many as 36,000 jobs and slightly over a billion dollars in labor earning could be lost in the next 35 years if greenhouse gas emissions don’t decline, according to the study commissioned by Montana Wildlife Federation. The study looked at the potential impact of a 5 degree Fahrenheit increase on a wide array of recreational activities, from sports fishing and hunting to skiing and state parks, but found the greatest potential for job loss in cattle raising and agriculture.
Senator Dick Barret, a former professor of economics, rightly called out the Republican fear mongering on the BBER research, noting that:
nothing in the BBER paper suggests that implementing the Clean Power Plan is going to devastate Montana’s economy. It will keep on growing, keep on providing families with incomes and economic opportunity, keep on providing workers with jobs. And all that will happen at just about the same pace as it would have if the Clean Power Plan had never darkened our doorstep.
It’s possible, as Daines, Zinke, and Gianforte seem to believe, that climate change is the most massive hoax in the history of the planet, with the vast majority of climate scientists, governments, and researchers coming together to invent a crisis for some unknown nefarious purpose. It seems just a bit more likely, though, that the reason nations came together in Paris and that scientists have increasingly loudly sounding the alarm about climate change is because we must make changes in the ways we produce energy and consume.
Running around misrepresenting economic data paid for by energy companies to scare people into voting for them may be an effective political strategy for these gentlemen, but it’s a morally bankrupt approach that threatens the Montana’s environment and economy moving forward. Just ask Ryan Zinke in 2010.