Lee Newspapers Run Misleading Daines Press Release Across the State

If you’ve read one of Montana’s Lee Newspapers in the past couple of days, you might be under the assumption that there is neither a single person in Montana who supports the Affordable Care Act nor a single reason the law is beneficial. Instead, you’ve been treated to a story from the Missoulian’s Jenna Cederberg which reads like a Steve Daines campaign piece against “radical Obamacare.”

According to the piece, a series of business leaders are concerned that they might have to pay more or deal with more onerous regulation because of the passage of the law. The opening of the piece is especially powerful, in which Cederberg writes:

With a burgeoning number of questions and few answers about what full implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will mean for businesses across Montana, a diverse set of stakeholders aired concerns Tuesday about rising costs and ever-larger mounds of red tape.

A dramatic lede, one worthy of the opening lines of a campaign press release or ad—but certainly not an accurate or balanced assessment of the Affordable Care Act.

What the piece fails to mention is that the “diverse set of stakeholders” was a hand-picked group of Daines supporters or that there was no public notice of the meeting before it took place. Even a cursory search of the Missoulian’s own web page shows that Daines didn’t publicize the event before it happened. If he had, I suspect the crowd would have been just a touch more “diverse.”

It’s not news when a Congressman gathers a collection of people who agree with his viewpoint so that they can parrot it back to him; it’s a campaign event. Worse, it’s one that leads readers to believe something that simply isn’t true.

The piece doesn’t include a single quote from a supporter of the Affordable Care Act. It doesn’t mention the cost savings that states are already starting to see, and it doesn’t even verify that the claims made about the law are accurate. There’s nothing resembling balance in the piece.

Now, my experience in journalism is limited to writing for my high school newspaper, but I seem to remember something about new stories covering both sides of political issues and providing context for the coverage.  At a minimum, this story should have included the viewpoint of a single supporter of the bill and provided context describing how this “diverse set” of opinion-leaders happened to gather to discuss the law. At a minimum.

Instead, Montana voters across the state (because Lee reprints the same stories all over) were misinformed and manipulated by a press corps too willing to be led by nose by political operatives.

If you appreciate an independent voice holding Montana politicians accountable and informing voters, and you can throw a few dollars a month our way, we would certainly appreciate it.

Subscribe to our posts

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba has been writing about Montana politics since 2005 and teaching high school English since 2000. He's a former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.
His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.
In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.


Click here to post a comment

Please enter an e-mail address

  • Could catch, Don.  I was scratching my head after reading the article in the Missoulian.  The headline itself was deceiving, “Daines hosts downtown Missoula roundtable on health care law.”  More like specifically  invited guests with an ax to grind or a program to advance.  
    We all know “Obamacare” isn’t perfect but Daines’ response is to scrap the whole thing and go back to the free market system of the past.  That worked well, didn’t it?  There weren’t any of the health care professionals at the meeting who support the Affordable Care Act (or government option or single payer) and there are a lot of those folks in this community.  
    One line that caught my eye was from the Bob Ward’s spokesman, “Many of the outdoor retailer’s employees ‘punch the clock for $8, $9, $10 an hour,’ making it hard to pay for insurance plans that are getting more and more expensive …”
    At those kind of wages, maybe Bob Ward’s can kick in a little extra for insurance, although it hasn’t been proven that employees premiums will actually go up.
    The same can be said for the employees at Opportunity Resources.  Subsidies should be made available to these employees, at the very least, or they should be able to enroll in Medicaid (whoops, Montana Republicans torpedoed that option).
    The AP touched on the Daines meeting in another story:
    At least that story gave a little bit of ink to supporters of the Affordable Care Act.  The main gist of the piece, however, was Daines meeting with Tea Party folks about the IRS.  Apparently, he does service that constituency quite well.

Support Our Work!

Subscribe Via E-mail


Which Democratic Candidate for Governor Do You Support Today?

Send this to a friend