Montana Politics

Tester’s Call for Burns’ Resignation

I think it was a necessary, bold move. And he's right. Like Barry Bonds, it's time for Senator Burns to go.

There is a good discussion going on over at Left in the West about Jon Tester’s call for Conrad Burns to resign, given the latest allegations by Jack Abramoff. Some posters seem concerned that it might not be the right move for Tester, but I think it was a necessary, bold move. And he’s right. Like Barry Bonds, it’s time for Senator Burns to go.

Maybe Tester’s call isn’t strategic. Ken Camp worries that the Democrats will be better off running against a damaged Burns than another Republican candidate in 2006, and Wulfgar wonders if it is a wise move. The reality is that, barring indictment (and maybe not even then) Burns isn’t getting out of this race–and fears about Rehberg or some other Republican riding in to save the day are probably unfounded.

That said, the value of the press release is that it demonstrates that Tester is going to take the fight to Burns and his corporate masters. There is no way in a close race that Burns and Republicans are going to run a clean race. We need a Democratic candidate who can attack–focused on the issues–and keep Burns on the defensive.

I’m beginning to admire the fight in Jon Tester, and starting to see the core values and committment to the democratic process that make this issue about more than winning an election. Tester seems genuinely concerned about the corruption rotting our system at core–and I’ll take that concern and honesty over clever strategy any day.

If you appreciate an independent voice holding Montana politicians accountable and informing voters, and you can throw a few dollars a month our way, we would certainly appreciate it.


Click here to post a comment

Please enter an e-mail address

  • I understand what Jon Tester is doing when he says Burns should resign. When I posted at Left in the West, I was hoping people like Matt Singer and others in Montana who know more about the state’s politics than me, would weigh in on the issue of is it better for Tester for Burns to resign and run against some like Rehberg, or should he just leave the issue of Burns’ resignation alone and take him on in the general.

  • My sense is that it’s probably better to run against Burns. Rehberg has come through the Abramoff mess pretty cleanly, even though he has some ethical lapses.

    The big news today is the speculation about Bob Keenan (and maybe even Rehberg) entering the primary.

Support Our Work!

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.
His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.
In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

Subscribe Via E-mail


What Industry Will Republicans Prop Up with Corporate Welfare Next?

Follow us on Twitter

0 /* ]]> */