The Community of Colstrip will be a Defining Moment for the Future of Montana Democrats (and Republicans)

Shares

This is a defining moment for Democrats in Montana, not to mention their Republican counterparts.

Later this week, the Montana Senate will hear Senate Bill 338 in committee. This legislation holds massive companies accountable for their actions by requiring them to cover the decommissioning costs associated with closing a major power plant, like the two units in Colstrip. Senate Bill 338 is reasonable and prudent. It even allows companies like Talen Energy and Puget Sound Energy, which own the units, to submit their own estimates on cost.

Don’t trust me? Well, even a wonky free-market Republican like Travis Kavulla understands the justifications for passing this bill.

When the Colstrip station closes, barring a miracle, the community is going to become a shell of its former self. The power plant’s place in that community makes Malmstrom Air Force Base’s place in Great Falls look small. A plant closure means an instant reduction in property values, a cost shift to the remaining taxpayers in the county, and a lot of stranded assets in the form of local government projects that still have outstanding balances on their bond arrangements…

Up until just a year ago, one of the Colstrip plant owners, Puget Sound Energy, which is the electric utility for the metro Seattle area, was singing its praises, suggesting it was one of its cheapest resources. That ended the day when the Sierra Club and Puget, and also Talen Energy, signed an agreement to close Units 1 and 2 of the facility by mid-2022 instead of facing further litigation over ash ponds near the property. For companies like Puget Sound Energy, that’s all fine. They stand to get all the money they need to close and all the money the need to build a new power plant.

The fact of the matter is that Colstrip, Montana has been in a rough spot for years.  Uncertainty has stalled the local economy and caused indescribable anxiety for the people who live there. Things are about to get worse.

Liberal blogger James Conner of the Flathead Memo makes the point better than I ever could:

It’s wrong to let coal companies strip the wealth from the earth, wrecking the landscape and despoiling land and water, without requiring that they invest in the rehabilitation of the communities and workers’ lives their greed has impacted. Instead of letting Talon, et al, take the money and run, Montana should take money from Talon before running Talon out of the state.

Have we not learned from the environmental, economic, and human disasters that followed the corporate greed and exits of our past? Just talk to someone who lived through the declines in Anaconda or Butte or the Flathead.

Workers did not create this mess. It wasn’t them and their families that decided to cut corners for profits, which inevitably led to the lawsuits that are forcing Unites 1 and 2 to close. These decisions were made by out-of-state executives with huge salaries and little care for the people who work for them.

I have little hope for the far-right wing of the Republican Party. They are unabashed in their support for profit over people. Instead, I’m looking at my own Democratic Party. This will be a defining moment. Will the Democratic Party continue its rightward shift towards corporate America or will it rediscover its populist soul, fight for people over profits, hold corporations accountable, and maybe even start winning elections again?

This legislation is about ensuring the massive corporations that have made huge profits off of our land and our people’s labor don’t just cut and run, leaving families unable to sell their homes, relocate, and transition. The choice should be an easy one.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Calamity Jan

22
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
15 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
12 Comment authors
Senate Bill 338 has backing from the entire political spectrum, Montana House should support is – Intelligent DiscontentLara MosdalLynnEric CoobsJames Conner Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
James Conner
Guest

I have corrected the spelling of Talen in my post at Flathead Memo. I prefer that readers send me email flagging my mistakes instead of flagging my errors in [sic] public comments on other blogs.

Pete Talbot
Admin

I can get behind SB 338, which would hold the power companies accountable for the decommissioning of existing coal-powered electric generating plants. I cannot get behind HB 585, a bill that would provide loans to power companies in an attempt to prop up these same dirty, aging plants — requested by Jim Keane (D-Butte).

trackback

[…] Discontent has a must read post up today about SB 338. Check it out. Here are a couple of […]

Anne Hedges
Guest
Anne Hedges

As a progressive I wholly disagree with your assessment. This bill requires no cleanup of the extensive contamination at the site (decommissioning is not defined as remediation). It does not require the owners post bonds to make sure the contamination is cleaned up should those owners go bankrupt. It provides no guarantee that workers would receive their pensions should Talen declare bankruptcy. It will send utilities and the clean energy industry running from Montana to any other state that doesn’t punish businesses for closing a out-dated uneconomic business. The folks of Colstrip deserve the town to be cleaned up, pensions… Read more »

Ted Pop
Guest
Ted Pop

This is the exact problem with the Democratic Party. Business interests and “business climate” have become more important than people. This has been happening since the 70s and this is why dems keep losing working people. And this bill does address some of the biggest issues with “transition.” Stop demonizing working people. Help them.

Your argument is smoke and mirrors aimed st helping big out of state utilities.

Oh and BTW, Puget Sound paid $50million when they closed a pant in their back yard. Why doesn’t montana get the same?

Bob Williams
Guest
Bob Williams

[“You shall not divide the body. You shall make good the body, air and water and land. Therefore Coal Company XYZ, shall fund secure pensions, and reliable remediation of the the area impacted by Coalstrip. Only then can you proceed in Bankruptcy Court.”] Anne, or anyone, i sure do not know but do wonder. Anything like the above bracketed imaginary sentences ever happen?? As I recall, it was then Rep Zinke who acted to defeat the DOI study of just how many dollars of royalty WAS DEVIOUSLY UNDERPAID. Therefore I’m wondering. Must have been preliminary estimates as to much coal… Read more »

Calamity Jan
Guest
Calamity Jan

Anne, it truly saddens me to see MEIC siding with these corporations. Your “business” argument is shallow. It’s something I’d expect to hear from a corporate shill in the GOP.

Mike Scott
Guest

This is a difficult bill for all of us, as I don’t know anyone working on issues around Colstrip that does not believe that the utilities should be responsible for clean up, for providing retraining opportunities, and for providing the community with resources to make an economic transition. However, there is absolutely nothing “shallow” about the the business argument in relation to this particular piece of legislation. The price tag on this bill is huge and the language is vague. Montana has the talent, the resources, and the infrastructure to stay in the energy export business. However, if this legislation… Read more »

James Conner
Guest

Mike, I do not accept the dichotomy you are positing: “Puget Sound Energy will need to replace Colstrip’s power. They can do that two ways. One is to build out renewables, particularly wind, in Montana. Why Montana? The wind blows here when they need it and the infrastructure is there. Their other option is to build out gas plants in WA.” The wind blow here when it blows, which sometimes is when it’s needed. The same is true of the wind in Washington, where there are many fine wind farms and wind farm sites east of the Cascades. Puget Sound… Read more »

James Conner
Guest

Please provide the number or numbers of the bill or bills that would do the things you believe should be done.

Pete Talbot
Admin

I’m confused, Anne. You’re saying that this bill doesn’t hold industry accountable for remediation or pensions or posting bonds but it will chase other industries away, clean or otherwise, because it is too onerous?

I agree, Colstrip needs help with transition. But what sort of a bill would you like to see that would achieve accountability and still encourage industry to locate here?

Calamity Jan
Guest
Calamity Jan

It’s kind of ironic that the organization (MEIC, headed by Anne Hedges) that sued the utilities into closing down Units 1 and 2 is suddenly worried about frightening away business.

Bob Williams
Guest
Bob Williams

Past and present MT PSC are the gatekeepers. Here’s a MEIC link to Clean Energy legislation in MT. http://meic.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DTEMarch2017POZ.pdf Here’s a push back at what appears to be a push away of Anne Hedges. Who commented with an asessment. Then was asked to come back with improvements and Bills. To me, there were attempts to exclude the commenter. Looks like it worked, now the commenter is challenged to ?defend, explain, develop, subjects of the assortment of parties besides MEIC involved in the suit, and the findings of the Court and the arguments. NOT MEIC but the Court voted to close.… Read more »

Publius II
Guest
Publius II

Let’s help Colstrip become ‘Wind and Solar ‘strip’ and move into the 21st Century Energy arena, not backwards!

Eric Coobs
Guest
Eric Coobs

I’m not sure of the purpose of this post – the Dems hate the mine and power plants at Colstrip, and couldn’t care less about all the workers, because they are in bed with the environmentalists instead.

That’s it. 1 & 2 are planning to close up BECAUSE of Democrats.

Calamity Jan
Guest
Calamity Jan

That’s not true. Colstrip 1&2 are closing because the utilities cut corners and MEIC sued. Now the workers are the only one’s set up to lose.

Lara Mosdal
Guest
Lara Mosdal

Yes. It would be so good to see something good and lasting come from resource extraction in Montana. I just finished reading 56 Counties and it seems the entire history of Montana is one long repetition of exploitation leaving behind gutted communities.

trackback

[…] If you haven’t read my first blog post on Senate Bill 338, please check it out. […]

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */