Greg Gianforte’s Salary Won’t Make Up For the Damage He’d Do To the State Budget

Shares

In the latest move of his increasingly desperate, negative campaign, Greg Gianforte decided to remind Montanans that he is too rich to possibly understand their concerns, announcing that he would donate his salary if elected governor.

That’s a lovely gesture, but one is left to ask what is preventing Mr. Gianforte from donating that money outside of the context of a political campaign. Probably the same thing that prevented him from buying the naming rights to a building at MSU until his campaign kicked off.

While the donation idea got Mr. Gianforte in the papers again yesterday, the $100,000 or so he’d donate each year would pale in comparison to the damage he’d do to the state if elected.

Just yesterday, the Montana Budget & Policy Center released a report detailing the one billion dollars of lost state revenue from the decision in 2003 to sharply reduce state taxes. As their report notes, the tax cuts were directed largely at the wealthiest of Montanans, with the top 1% of incomes receiving over 55% of the tax cuts:

The trend of the 2003 law disproportionately benefiting the wealthiest continues today. From 2005 to 2016, the wealthiest 1% of Montanans received over $536 million (or 55%) of the tax cuts brought about by the legislation.14 Montana families earning between $25,000 and $60,000 have seen almost no benefit at all.

As the report notes, the cost has been a more prosperous Montana. The lost one billion dollars could have covered the deferred maintenance at every public school in the state or rebuilt our highway infrastructure, not to mention have provided educational opportunities for low-income families. All lost, so that the wealthiest of Montanans could enjoy massive tax breaks while the rest of us received almost nothing.

And who was one of the cheerleaders for the 2003 tax cuts? None other than current Republican candidate for governor and proud champion of the 1%, Greg Gianforte. Back then, to address the plight of his executives making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, he advocated eliminating the capital gains tax—and replacing Montana’s income tax with the most regressive kind of tax, a sales tax.

And after getting everything he wanted but the sales tax, he set up a satellite office in Texas for his highest-paid employees anyway.

And now he wants to do more damage. His 4-0-6 tax plan would blow another massive hole in the state’s budget for the sake of reducing the tax burden on himself, his wealthy friends, and huge companies, who would see almost all of the reductions. The Department of Revenue notes that Gianforte’s plan would cost the state $125 million a year, meaning even fewer resources to rebuild our crumbling roads and deficient schools.

Gianforte himself would get a tax break of over $75,000 annually. You and I might be able to buy a few more lattes.

Gianforte is just selling the Republican snake oil with tax cuts. He promises “tax relief” to entice voters, who perhaps don’t know that the vast majority of the relief will go to people who simply don’t need it, at the expense of the vital functions of government and community that taxes pay for.

And it simply won’t lead to the economic boom that Gianforte and his cronies claim it will. Just ask the people of Kansas, where job growth has been almost non-existent and school districts have had to shut down for a lack of funding. What Mr. Gianforte wants to do to Montana had led to a disaster for Kansas:

“Neighboring states have had more income tax revenue to make the public investment that improves quality of life. They’ve been able to support schools, safe communities, health care, roads and other essentials. Kansas, meanwhile, is seeing income tax revenue 11.6 percent below before the tax cuts were enacted.

While Mr. Gianforte might feel that the offer to give $100,000 if elected is a generous one, a more magnanimous offer would be to simply pay his fair share of taxes and not propose to do further damage to our state for the sake of a $75,000 tax cut he clearly doesn’t need.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Kevin D CurtisBillPublius II Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Publius II
Guest
Publius II

Gianforte, will you use the salary to keep funding the ‘BejeSus and Dinosaur walking’ Muzeam place that sayz world only 6,000 years old? Sounds like a Weaner!

Bill
Guest
Bill

Under Gov. Bullock’s watch, government expenses increased an astounding 20.6 percent during his term! This is even more worrisome when you are reminded that 45 percent of that budget is funded by the federal government which is $18.6 trillion in debt.

Your call

Kevin D Curtis
Guest
Kevin D Curtis

Hey yeah, we should do the “Conservative free market economics” thing like the Republican Governors in Louisiana, Kansas, Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois did! We can bankrupt our state just like them, be forced to cut everything, raise taxes at the local level to balance the budget, have our credit rating lowered, and diminish our entire state….lol!! You are a foolish person if you think increasing a budget by 20% and still having a surplus is a bad thing. Conservative Republican economics are in fact a race to the bottom for all but the very wealthy and the proof keeps coming… Read more »

Kevin D Curtis
Guest
Kevin D Curtis

Greg Gianforte has led a privileged easy life, born wealthy he increased his wealth with the “Golden Bootstraps” given to him, then he moved to Montana as a Millionaire and used his “Golden Bootstraps” again to increase his massive wealth even more and now he’s telling us all how to live our lives and that no one works hard enough. Gianforte does not know how hard the working class and the working poor in fact have to work just to get by!

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */