On the Perils of Inexperience, Part 2: Reporting on the Democratic Legislators’ Meeting

Shares

I won’t make a habit of these posts, as they serve little purpose in a print media landscape that has become almost entirely about squeezing out profit at the expense of actual reporting, but the latest example of what passes for ethical reporting in the Lee Newspapers deserves at least brief comment.

Today, the Billing Gazette (and the rest of the Lee papers) ran (or will run) a story about the proposed Democratic legislative caucus at Fairmont Hot Springs in February. The story includes quote from Representatives Jenny Eck and Mary Sheehy Moe, as well as Helena attorney Mike Meloy, all of whom offer their opinions about open meeting laws and party caucuses.

You could read about that in the Lee papers, or you could have read about it at the Montana Free Press four days earlier, when John Adams, formerly at the Great Falls Tribune, wrote about it. Who did he interview for his story? Eck, Moe, Meloy, and a few others. You could have also read or heard it on Montana Public Radio the next day.

What you won’t have read in the Lee story is any attribution for the original reporting done by Mr. Adams. And that’s just incredibly inappropriate. Once upon a time, I believe Lee Enterprises had an online version of their ethics policies, but I can’t seem to locate them any longer, which is probably a good thing. The Associated Press, however, did issue an instructive set of guidelines for giving credit to other journalists back in 2010. It states, in part:

In the age of the Web, the sourcing and reliability of information has become ever more crucial. So it is more important than ever that we be consistent and transparent in our handling of information that originated elsewhere than our own reporting….Giving credit to another organization that broke a story first, even when we match it — or advance it — through our own reporting. Attributing facts we haven’t gathered or confirmed on our own.

Now, it wouldn’t be fair to hold reporters to the ethical standards of another news organization, but I think you’d be hard-pressed to find a journalist who didn’t agree with the broad idea of this standard, that journalists should give credit to those who break stories and respect the effort that goes into reporting them.

And all of this comes only a few weeks after another Lee reporter asked the state to turn over all the information requested by other media outlets in the Bullock/McLain story when Lee was almost a week late in making its request.

As bad as not giving credit to the original reporting done by Adams was, the story further demonstrates the perils of inexperience when the reporter of the Lee story quotes Chuck Johnson, the state political reporter Lee pushed out of his job, to explain the judicial history of the contentious caucus issue:

Longtime state government reporter Chuck Johnson, who is on the Montana Newspaper Association’s FOIA Hotline board, remembered the discussions that led 22 Montana news outlets to file suit in 1995. Actions were occurring in caucus that made the discussion and votes on the floor a formality,” Johnson said. “We felt sometimes that the majority party, that was the Republicans at the time, had already had their discussions and made up their minds.”

In the end, this piece by the new political/state/enterprise/stuff reporter for the Lee Newspapers echoed original reporting done by another reporter four days earlier, including the use of almost all the same sources and relied on the wisdom and experience of the very reporter her chain forced out of his job. While the new reporters certainly aren’t responsible for corporate decisions, they are responsible for their own ethical standards of reporting, as is whomever is editing these stories for Lee.

The Lee chain can keep telling its readership that there’s no cost to forcing out experienced reporters, or even that the product will somehow be better, but the evidence of the past few weeks suggests that, both in terms of reporting, and ethical standards, we’ve already lost a great deal.

Update: An updated version of the Lee story now also includes a quote from MSU political science professor David Parker, as did the original story by Adams.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Don PogrebaSteve WoodruffdpogrebaGreg Strandberg Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Greg Strandberg
Guest

How do you feel about the possibility of just 11 Democrats meeting in February. That’s the number they need to have in order to avoid having too many people, and thus opening the meeting to the public.

I personally feel they should have the meeting open to the public. Remember how much complaint there was over the GOP Jorgenson’s meeting this time last January?

Why are Democrats setting themselves up for the same? I feel that’s the wrong path to take.

Steve Woodruff
Guest
Steve Woodruff

I just went through the interesting exercise of throwing out thousands of old newspaper clippings – all of the hard copy from my life’s work. Even cursory examination of many of my old stories confirmed that I was young and green once. But I stuck with it; got lots of help and encouragement; and gained valuable experience – mostly through trial and error, a lot of error. I struggled to follow big footsteps and, I’m sure, was a frequent source of disappointment to many. It was much the same for those working around me. Nobody has higher regard for my… Read more »

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */