Keep Helena’s Confederate Memorial Fountain, But…

Shares

Recently there has been some debate in Helena about the propriety of keeping a fountain that serves as a monument to the Confederacy in Hill Park. One of my former students wrote a thoughtful letter to the editor suggesting that the monument be rededicated to “a cause that celebrates Montana’s history of fostering equality.”

The Montana Cowgirl blog offers more support for rededicating the monument, arguing that “it’s hard to understand how anyone would oppose rededicating a monument currently dedicated to the battle to keep slavery legal,” while the Flathead Memo argues Helena should “recycle the granite in the spirit of beating swords into plowshares.”

Commenters at both the IR and the MT Cowgirl have swooped in on outraged wings to argue that changing or removing the fountain is just another example of liberals wanting to rewrite history, with some, of course, going as far as to suggest that renaming the fountain is something Stalin would have done or ISIS is doing, always the measure of someone interested in a reasoned argument.

What that argument ignores is that this nation has been subjected to over a century of historical revisionism about the nature of the Confederacy that has become so pervasive that a majority of American high school students don’t believe the South left the Union over slavery, but for “states’ rights.”

And who was most responsible for reshaping public perception of the war? A group called the United Daughters of the Confederacy, who spent 1894-1960s in efforts to “revere the memory of those heroes in gray and to honor that unswerving devotion to principle which has made the confederate soldier the most majestic in history,” building monuments to the war as part of their strategy.

The truth is that the only rewriting of history that has really happened is the bizarre effort to paint the Civil War as something other than what it was: the insurrection of a band of traitors willing to rip the nation in half to preserve the odious institution of slavery.

Given that the Helena City Commission plans to discuss next week whether anything should be done with the monument, I’d like to offer a humble proposal: keep the monument, but make sure that it actually tells the history of the Confederacy. While my initial thought was passing a law that required all Confederate monuments fly the white flag of surrender, I realized that would be a missed opportunity to preserve history, as defenders of the Confederacy purport to care so much about.

So, my proposal is this: if we keep the Confederate monument, the city should add a series of plaques or other displays providing historical context, including the following information:

  • that the rather short Confederate constitution included no fewer than ten references to slavery;
  • that in its Declaration of Causes, almost singularly obsessed with slavery, the people of South Carolina, wrote of the North that “they have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.”
  • that the people of Georgia rebelled against the Union almost entirely because of slavery, writing in their declaration of causes that: “For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property.”
  • that the people of Mississippi, in their declaration opened with this: “Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery– the greatest material interest of the world.”
  • that the people of Louisiana left, “bound together by the same necessity and determination to preserve African slavery.”
  • that the Vice President of the Confederacy, in his Cornerstone Speech argued that slavery was the cause of the rebellion: “The new Constitution has put at rest forever all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institutions—African slavery as it exists among us—the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution.”
  • quotes from the moving slave narratives about the real lives of slaves in the South.

If the defenders of historical integrity would prefer other examples, I am more than willing to compromise, as each state that left the Union at the time of the Civil War left largely for fear that Abraham Lincoln would eventually abolish their “peculiar institution” and there is copious historical evidence attesting to the Confederacy’s focus on slavery.

I am sympathetic to the argument that we need to be careful about tearing down parts of our history, because preserving our worst moments can serve us, but only if we use those moments to tell the entire story. The city of Helena, appearing to sanction, by its prominent placement in a city park, the hateful ideology of the Confederacy cannot be permitted to continue, but if we transform the site into a place of authentic memory, complete with the history of the horrors of the institution the Confederacy was birthed to defend, Helena might just offer its young people history of value.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

21
Leave a Reply

avatar
8 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Linda GryczanLKBob WilliamsKen TaylorEverett T. McGill Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
jangoodell
Guest
jangoodell

Only lately have I been able to reconcile my disparate education of the southern insurrection. Growing up, I knew that we (USA) fought to end slavery. However, in high school (70’s), I was presented with the information that the war was over economics and state’s rights. Savvy students figured out the economics and state’s right was slavery. Sadly, many fell for the ruse.

dpogreba
Guest

It’s interesting to think about how the things we’re taught stick with us. I certainly remember being taught that the war was more about the rights of Southern states. Even the textbook we have used in Helena (changing this year) deemphasizes the role of slavery, talking about “Southern culture” and rights more than slavery as the cause of secession.

Ken Taylor
Guest
Ken Taylor

I wonder if this is one of the textbooks approved by the text adoption group in Texas? There apparently has been a concerted effort sanitizing the history of that period. And, textbook publishers are pretty spineless where sales are involved. I grew up during the 50’s and 60’s, lived in the Yankee East until we moved to Montana. Folks back then were still pretty actively “fighting the Civil War.” Of course, this was also the period of Brown V Board of Education, and the continued challenge of Jim Crow. In fact, what is missing in this whole discussion is an… Read more »

Bob Williams
Guest
Bob Williams

I remember being frustrated at US History College classes in late fifties. Social Historians pushed their methods , not documented history.
Meanwhile Econ classes again and again pushed mathematical models that proved free trade is a win-win-win.

geezer Bob

LK
Guest
LK

Inbreds luv revisionist history as a means to promote their anti-gubmint views. The slave owners were the REAL Murcans ’cause they didn’t take no crap off’n no liberals in D.C. Liberals have destroyed the country. The south had full employment and a good economy. GOD BLESS THE SOUTH, THE REAL MURCA! They talk real slow down there ’cause they ARE real slow down there! We don’t need them up here in Montana!
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/04/civil-war-american-south-still-loves-confederacy-116771.html#.VZbQS-nnahw

Everett T. McGill
Guest
Everett T. McGill

Spot on proposal Dan. Instead of hiding from a terrible period we need to get it out in the open where it will no longer fester and address all the points.

Yes the CSA tried to tear this nation apart in order to maintain their hold on another race.

Citizens of the Southern States have also disproportionately served this country in defense of liberty after that Civil war.

There is much to learn from the period of 1860-2016.

LK
Guest
LK

Really? The south actually tried to DEFEND liberty after the civil war?? For whom? All them black folks they lynched? Got it. Yes, they epitomized the words with liberty and justice for all! I’m sure that many of my relatives and ancestors committed an horrific genocide during WWII, but you know what? WE DON’T CELEBRATE THAT SH*T! Nor honor it. Nor commemorate it! It’s not something I’m particularly proud of. We just try to forget it and understand how they could do such things to fellow human beings using the context of history.

Everett T. McGill
Guest
Everett T. McGill

“We just try to forget it and understand how they could do such things to fellow human beings using the context of history.”

Those who ignore history or attempt to forget often end up repeating the same mistakes.

LK
Guest
LK

Your inbred brain got your tongue, cupcake? For WHOM, did they fight for freedumb? You’re welcome. I don’t generally educate folks without a fee! You’ve got nothing. Where you from, southern dude? This is Montana. The southern hatred is NOT our heritage! Tear ALL that racist sh*t down! For the record, I DID serve in Nam with all my southern buddies. I know them well. Did YOU?! Jus’ askin’, Me? Nope. Never been east of Sidney, Mt. But I know what the south’s all about! LET THE GAMES BEGIN! I’m ready.

LK
Guest
LK

The new south looks a LOT like the old south! Inbred racist reeetarts! Hey, I have an idea. Let’s CELEBRATE racist reetartism with a fountain! Right, Daughters of Inbred Dudes? Why not?! We elected Sen. Cornhole Burns. We can do anything! (sniff) Sorry, I get all weepy when I think about all the great things in the land of cotton! An entire economy based upon the debasement and subjugation of other human beings is just SO patridiotic that I want to run out and buy me ’bout ten Dixie Swastika flags! (break into song here) Oh I whist I was… Read more »

Everett T. McGill
Guest
Everett T. McGill

You go onahead, you are doing just fine making an ass out of yourself without any assistance from me. Happy 7/4.

LK
Guest
LK

Me THINKS my favorite writer Joe Bageant (a southerner by the way) is talking about YOU, McGullible! Put an Murcan flag on your truck and Jeezus in your dull brain, and you think you won the lottery! Jeezus plus nothing. Ever heard of that? It’s what the fascists want you to believe! In his book Travels with Charlie published in 1962, Steinbeck writes about returning to Seattle after a long absence. He was amazed at the changes, and said, “Why does progress look so much like destruction”? I would ask, why does patriotism look so much like fascism? Easy answer.… Read more »

LK
Guest
LK

Yup.comment image:large

LK
Guest
LK

HAPPY JESUS DAY, everybody! And for my atheist friends, Happy Fourth of July! And yes, I still pray mightily every day that you will accept GI Jeezus as your personal savior so that you too can become one of us, a REAL Murcan! For you see, not only did Jeezus ride a dinosaur, He ALSO wrote the Declaration of Independence! Boy that Jeezus really got around!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/03/americans-us-morality_n_7650062.html

LK
Guest
LK

Unfortunately for the inbred christofascist crowd, they founding fathers were NOT what they THINK they were! I plan to get this book, but in the meantime, you can find lots of good interviews with the author. He kinda wrote this book in response to all the christofascist nonsense out there. The reality is that our founding fathers were actually card carrying atheists! They were simply to intelligent to fall for the religiobullshit spouted by the inbreds of their time! And THAT, my inbred friends, is how we became a free country!
http://www.wnyc.org/story/infidels-and-atheists-who-founded-america/

LK
Guest
LK

Some recent arrivals to the great white homeland (Montana) from down south who really like that fountain. I think they’re Gen. Robert E. Skees supporters too!
http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2237/7075/original.jpg

LK
Guest
LK

This is why all this confederate sh*t matters! It is being used to undo every progressive idea that was won though struggle. Are we really a backward fascist nation? We all get a chance to decide that. I say challenge the inbreds at every opportunity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/26/opinion/the-difference-between-politically-incorrect-and-historically-wrong.html?_r=1

Linda Gryczan
Guest

I would like to invite everyone with an opinion on this issue to a Constructive Conversation on the Confederate fountain this Saturday, August 22, 6:30 pm at the Neighborhood Center at 200 S Cruse Ave.

We are a group of conservatives and liberals who disagree about most things. We do agree that everyone deserves to be heard in respectful conversation. For more info go to our Facebook event page at https://www.facebook.com/events/462126897303275/ or email me at [email protected].

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */