Daines Co-Sponsors Bigotry Bill

Shares

For all the talk during the campaign about the importance of electing someone with extensive experience in middle management and outsourcing to the US Senate, it seems Senator Daines is less interested in working to improve the economy than he is in imposing his narrowminded, bigoted moral view about the rights of LGBT Americans. Hell, he’s so committed to the idea of punishing LGBT people for the crime of being in love and wanting to spend their lives together that he’s even willing to raise their taxes—and deny gay members of the military the right to benefits enjoyed by all service men and women.

Daines signed onto “Calgary” Ted Cruz’s State Marriage Defense Act, which would, according to David Badash  take out all federal guidelines and laws that recongize gay marriages and encourage some rootin’ tootin’ nullification in the event the Supreme Court recognizes that LGBT Americans are human beings entitled to equal rights and deserve to be able to marry:

First, redefine marriage at the federal level to remove from hundreds of thousands of same-sex couples the federal government’s recognition of their marriages, and thus, any corresponding federal benefits they are afforded, now or in the future. And second, should the U.S. Supreme Court not find a right to marriage for same-sex couples, encourage states that do not wish to recognize those marriages to potentially nullify them.

Conservatives know they are on the wrong side of history on this issue and recognize that they can only scare older voters with the specter of gay marriage for a few more cycles, but are hellbent on using it to gin up support from gullible bigots for as long as they can. They use gay marriage the same way televangelists bilk their audience, by invoking terrifying images of human love and offering the salvation of symbolic, bigoted legislation.

Daines should be ashamed of himself, and not just because he’s fighting on the wrong side of march towards human equality, but because he has to know that this crusade is as nonsensical as it is wrong. In his press conference, Cruz called for a defense of “traditional marriage,” which even if you believe the Earth is only 6,000 years old, means a lot than protecting heterosexual marriage. Just a few generations ago, “traditional marriage” meant that whites could not marry blacks; a few generations before that, it meant that women could not divorce, except under extraordinary circumstances; a few hundred years earlier, it meant children marrying, and in Biblical times, it meant polygamy. Cruz and Daines are hardly defending “traditional” marriage; they are defending their religion’s current version of marriage—and nothing else.

We have a long, sordid history in this country of conservative bigots using the mantra of states’ rights to impose their hateful views on the rest of us. What Senator Daines is endorsing here is no different, just worse because the rest of society has evolved (sorry, Steve!) so much.

 

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.
Join a discussion of this (and all of our post) at our Facebook community page.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

4 Comments

Click here to post a comment
  • A personal note: I happen to be, at this very moment, on the Northern California Coast. It’s an unusually warm and sunny day. And the reason: a wedding for two of my favorite people. They’ve been partners for over 30 years now. A kinder, more generous and thoughtful couple would be hard to find. Although they live in Missoula, they chose Northern California because when they made their plans, marriage in Montana was only legal between “one man and one woman.” It seems like half of Missoula know my friends as they are active in the arts, politics and culture of Montana (and do they know how to throw a party!).

    Congratulations, John and Tony.

    And a pox on Steve Daines’ House.

  • You are the BEST, Don P…bigotry is founded in constructive social order…we must stop sending people like Daines to DC…he merely continues to pound “nails” into a “falling down” system…best wishes, Joe.

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */