Four Year Terms for Congress?


As I was looking this evening for a speech supporting the Vietnam War to accompany my class’s reading of The Things They Carried, I came across something I hadn’t heard before: in 1966, Lyndon Baines Johnson proposed making the terms for members of Congress last four years.  In his State of the Union address, Johnson made the case:

The present 2-year term requires most Members of Congress to divert enormous energies to an almost constant process of campaigning — depriving this Nation of the fullest measure of both their skill and their wisdom. Today, too, the work of government is far more complex than in our early years, requiring more time to learn and more time to master the technical tasks of legislating. And a longer term will serve to attract more men of the highest quality to political life. The Nation, the principle of democracy, and, I think, each congressional district, will all be better served by a 4-year term for Members of the House. And I urge your swift action.

Loathe as I would be to suggest this idea now that Ryan Zinke represents Montana in Washington, Johnson’s proposal, despite its sexist language, makes even more sense today than it did in the 1960s. Our newest Congressman started a PAC before he won his election and is already on the conservative talk show circuit, no doubt hoping to raise his profile for wealthy donors.

Four-year terms might not address the abuses of campaign finance and they might not eliminate the role of money in our elections, but they might just give candidates enough time in office to cast votes that are about something other than winning an election a few months down the road.

In the end, I settled on Richard Nixon’s Silent Majority speech for my class, an excellent contrast with the Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence speech we have been studying.


If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

Leave a Reply

1 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Don PogrebalokywokySchool for the blinded Recent comment authors
Notify of
School for the blinded
School for the blinded

Naive in the extreme, you are. If it were only money that controlled them once elected, but far from it. Unless they are like a pony that is already broken before riding, they don’t stand a chance of nomination, much less election. Once in office the levers over them include bribes, sexy easy interns, call girls, easy money, primary opponents, and anything in their past, including sheep dipping, that can be used against them. Curious about your class. You assign reading? Does it ever occur to you to let a kid go whichever way his own brain takes him, or… Read more »


“Blinded” in case you hadn’t noticed – in any debate – class or actual – the terms of the thing are usually rather narrowly defined. Not go any which way. The Author teaches debate classes, not finding JohnnySusie or whatever. From what I’ve seen, most kids nowdays hardly know that the Vietnam War even happened at all, let alone care about it. Maybe these two speeches are just a jumping off place to start a discussion. And I cannot think of a better place than these two “speakers” to begin that exploration. Wish I was in the class! A Vietnam… Read more »

Support Our Work!


What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */