Things to know about the Crimean Peninsula

Shares

As Crimea increasingly appears to be the most dangerous flashpoint in the unfolding situation in Ukraine, it’s worth knowing a few things about the region. In order of importance, in my opinion, are a few of them.

1. Russia has the right to place soldiers there. While the recent re-deployment is threatening and uncalled for, it is not, strictly speaking, illegal. Russia has always maintained a military base in the Crimea and has signed agreements about the stationing of troops there to protect it. This is why Ukraine has not yet acted.

2. The Russian occupation doesn’t match its stated goals. Russians are a majority in the Crimea, and the local government and local armed forces are friendly to the Russian cause. Claims by the Putin government to be protecting their ‘citizens and compatriots’ are dubious at best. The thirty some percent of the population that is Ukrainian, Tatar, or some other ethnicity is in much more danger than the ethnic Russians. Moreover, danger for Russians in the rest of the country can only increase as a result of Russian hostilities – Russia seizing Crimea to protect Russian citizens in Kharkov makes about as much sense as the US invading Tijuana to protect Americans in Cancun – the danger from nationalism only increases with hostile acts.

3. Russia has no legal claim to the peninsula, and in fact is legally bound to protect Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The Budapest Memorandum of 1994 guaranteed as much, in exchange for Ukraine giving up its massive Soviet-era weapons stockpile. Russia has certainly violated the letter and spirit of this agreement by using military force to attempt to remove Crimea from Ukraine.

4. There is, however, a pretty good international precedent for such actions. Should the majority of Crimea vote for independence and Ukraine be forced to accept it, Ukraine would be in no better position than Serbia was regarding Kosovo to reject that decision. Russia will undoubtedly bring this up if there is a debate in the UN (both sides here would be hypocrites, however, as Russia still refuses to recognize Kosovar independence even after 108 other nations have).

5. Ukraine has showed impressive restraint thus far – the current Ukrainian government has thus done better than Saakashvili’s government in Georgia did at avoiding a war they can’t possibly win. This is also contradicts the Russian characterization of the Kiev government as one of bloodthirsty nationalists.

6. Saying Crimea is a ‘historically Russian province’ is a bit misleading. Until 1944, Crimea was inhabited by Crimean Tatars, remnants of a Khanate that ruled most of Southern Ukraine (indeed, the word Ukraine comes from the word for frontier, and the famed Ukrainian cossacks were granted semi-autonomy in exchange for holding the border with the Muslim Tatars). Crimea had consistently sought independence and had the status of an independent SSR until World War II, after which the vast majority of the Tatars were shipped to central Asia and replaced with Russian-speakers. (Similar displacements removed other ethnic minorities from Ukraine and greatly decreased the Ukrainian population, again making room for more Russians to move in). I don’t say this because I think it invalidates the claims of over a million Russians currently living in Crimea, but many are appealing to the authority of history to ‘prove’ that the Crimean peninsula belongs to Russia. It belongs to Russia by the exact same claim that settlements in Palestine ‘belong’ to Israel.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

The Polish Wolf

56
Leave a Reply

avatar
12 Comment threads
44 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Larry Kralj, Environmental RangersThe Polish WolfCraig MooreLynnThe Polish Wolf Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Mark Tokarski
Guest

Pop quiz: Who was it said “Yes, I am an ardent anti-imperialist. And glad not to be a liberal, if being a liberal means to accept our country’s drive to hegemony. And the conclusion that I draw from looking at Polish Wolf’s attempt to bad-mouth me in public is that he is OK with the CIA and the NED destabilizing Ukraine, because somehow the outcome will be better than what they now have. He is an imperialist sympathizer.” ?

Someone not allowed to post here?

New low, PW. New low.

Don Pogreba
Admin

No one is not allowed to post here, troll. Nice try.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Reminds me, you are second only to PW in the high art of pontificating without requisute curiosity to begin to know what you’re ralking about. You might srart by reading non-sterile history and reading non-american journalism. Everything thT is going on in Ukraine is easily knowable, and you know none of it. You’re boring!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

MT

Mark Tokarski
Guest

Comment above was thumb-pecked on my IPhone, and I could not see enough of it to edit.

Don Pogreba
Admin

If I bore, leave. That seems like a relatively simple proposition.

Before you do, though, please enlighten us benighted souls and explain “everything” about Ukraine. We hunger for the wisdom you’ve accumulated from your position so close to the conflict.

Mark Tokarski
Guest

I wrote at length about it, great game and all Steve Kelly also a good source. Not too many people see outside the American indoctrinary system, you know, Putin demonized, neo-Nazis now fighting for democracy in your world view, such as it is. You certainly don’t. If you have no breadth or depth, if you are not well-read in both war and post war history, and if you sit here an pontificate anyway, well yes, yer really, really boring. You’re right. I need to get out of this stupid blog! So do you. me, to get away from your and… Read more »

Don Pogreba
Admin

Typical. When you are asked to provide your in-depth knowledge, you retreat to personal attacks.

I’m really curious to hear your analysis that is clearly better than what I have read. Have a link to these insights?

Mark Tokarski
Guest

Oh screw you. I’ve been writing a blog for six years. It’s in the phone book. Lots of stuff going on there. Not much going on here. I’ve been reading and HAVE BEEN CURIOUS about how the world world really works for 26 years now. Go to hell Don. You’re not worth the trouble.

Don Pogreba
Admin

Well argued.

lizard19
Guest
lizard19

simple question, which country started the violence, Georgia or Russia?

lizard19
Guest
lizard19

simple answer, it was Georgia in 2008 who initially engaged in hostilities toward South Ossetia.

The Polish Wolf
Guest

South Ossetia wasn’t a country. Georgia’s actions were entirely in line with their sovereign right to enforce their rule within their borders. By your logic, the US is innocent in the Vietnam war because North Vietnam ‘started the violence’ by attempting to impose its government on the South. The parallel with Kosovo is almost perfect. The important difference is that while Serbia was given multiple opportunities to withdraw from Kosovo before the bombings began in earnest, Russia jumped straight into an invasion of undisputed Georgian territory. That, of course, doesn’t erase the fact that Saakashvili made an unforgivably enormous error… Read more »

Don Pogreba
Admin

When you used the word “logic” there, I think you made a mistake. 🙂

lizard19
Guest
lizard19

what was Georgia’s actions? did those actions include killing people? why was lethal force justified? and if the territory is undisputed, as you claim, then why the beef in the first place?

The Polish Wolf
Guest
The Polish Wolf

I don’t know that much about Georgia, but your questions are all good ones. Yes, people were killed in South Ossetia. The justification of lethal force depends on whether you privilege state sovereignty or human rights. Under international law, yes, it was absolutely justified – South Ossetia is not sovereign, and yet armed groups were trying to assert that it was. Georgia thus had the right to use military force to put them. down. I ‘claim’ the territory is disputed, which is somewhat incorrect – in fact, there was no dispute under international law; the territory belonged to Georgia, and… Read more »

Publius II
Guest
Publius II

Excellent assessment. I wonder if Ukraine will blockade the pennisula?

James Conner
Guest

Good post.

Putin now says the deposed Ukrainian head honcho asked for Russian intervention, which if true provides a fig leaf of legal and political cover for the Russian presence in the Crimea.

Whether Russia’s action is legal is one question. Whether it’s a mistake is another, and I would argue, more important, question. I don’t think the answer will be crystal clear until events unfold further.

Mark Tokarski
Guest

The other end of tunnel vision. God what drivel!

The Polish Wolf
Guest

Six comments without uttering one fact or bit of analysis contrary to what was stated? It’s a new record, Mark!

Greg Strandberg
Guest

Why are we all acting like we can do something? The only one I see that can do anything is Putin. He else has that much power over there? The EU? I don’t see them doing anything. The UN? How will they enforce anything? The US? We don’t want to be over there anymore than we wanted to be in Syria, and they’ve got kids dying over there. I wonder if this would be such a big thing without the oil in the Black Sea. Also, seems most of those people in Crimea want the Russians there. Doesn’t that count… Read more »

The Polish Wolf
Guest

Greg –

The US can very easily intervene in the crisis – we don’t need Russia for anything, unlike Europe. Bypass the IMF, lend Ukraine 15B directly. Prevent a disastrous default. As to Crimea – Russia is violating their written agreements, and they need to pay a price for that, but I agree that Ukraine’s claim to Crimea basically exists only on paper now, and attempting to hold it contrary to the will of the people is foolish.

Greg Strandberg
Guest

I think lending money to Ukraine is kind of like lending to family members – don’t expect to see it again.

I’d much rather Putin have that chess piece. What good does it do us?

Strong people dictate history and that’s Putin. I don’t see any strong people in the West right now.

lizard19
Guest
lizard19

violated written agreements? more please.

Lynn
Guest
Lynn

“Do Russian troops have a right to be in Crimea?

Russia’s take: Yes. A treaty between the neighboring nations allows Russia to have up to 25,000 troops in Crimea, Russia’s U.N. envoy said Monday, adding that Yanukovych requested that Russia send military forces.

Ukraine’s take: No. Russian troops amassing in Crimea and near the border with Ukraine are an “act of aggression.”

United States’ take: No, and Russian President Vladimir Putin is playing a dangerous game. The consequences of military action “could be devastating,” U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power said Monday.”

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/03/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-fight-over-facts/index.html?iid=article_sidebar

Greg Strandberg
Guest

It’s always devastating when it’s not the US pulling the trigger, isn’t it. More devastating to our jingoistic sensibilities perhaps.

The Polish Wolf
Guest
The Polish Wolf

Check the link in the post – the signatories are not to use either economic coercion, threats of force, or force in any attempt to abridge Ukraine’s territorial integrity. So far Russia has used 2 of 3.

Mark Tokarski
Guest

You are most unstudied in these matters, no background, no curiosity, repeating American talking points. You’ve not left your comfort zone. It’s OK to be uninformed, as we all start that way, but not OK to posture as an informed person knowing nothing and timid about stepping out of bounds.

And of course you’re a teacher. Why am I not surprised? That selection process is so interesting, the more boring and rote advancing.

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Mark, on your travels what motel do you sleep at that you awake as the tongue wagging, judgmental schoolmarm? Do you really think that your attempts to shame people are effective? Are you really merely a slave to your ego?

Mark Tokarski
Guest

I explained the phenomenon at my blog. It’s sad, but part of our authority structure. PW either internalizes the structure, or does something else for a living. You could stand to get out a bit Craig? I’ve never read an original thought from you.

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Your explanation fails in every respect.

Mark Tokarski
Guest

typical of the incurious. You did not venture out to read what I said? this blog is Western fort for the intellectually timid.

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Mark, you wrote, ” I want to be brief here, as I want not to care about this stuff.”

But yet here you are scolding and badgering others to accept your magnificence…. and quite upset when they don’t.

Mark Tokarski
Guest

You didn’t read it! You quoted the opening line. What the hell is wrong with you people?

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Apparently you don’t know what you write, as I quoted the SECOND line… the “yeah but” to all that followed there and continues here.

With apologies to Burt Bacharach,

What’s it all about, MarK?
Is it just for the moment we live?
What’s it all about when you sort it out, Mark?
Are we meant to take more than we give
Or are we meant to be kind?
And if only fools are kind, Mark,
Then I guess it’s wise to be cruel.
And if life belongs only to the strong, Mark,
What will you lend on an old golden rule?

Mark Tokarski
Guest

You don’t read, never leave your comfort zone, never examine your assumptions, but demand to be treated as a person whose “opinions” matter. They don’t. They are the stuff of power of suggestion of others, just like PW and Don, nothing more, and not worth the time.

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Mark, I have never made any such demands… unlike you and your boring persistence to have everyone genuflect to your intellectual dominance.

IMHO, everyone is entitled to their own opinions… even you. Just park that toilet plunger you use to shove them down the throats of others.

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers

Really?? Really?? THIS is why we Americans can’t have nice things in this country. I mean, this is really the purest definition of insanity I can think of! Giving money to hopeless causes as some sort of gesture while your own people suffer.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/04/ukraine-aid-package_n_4895483.html?1393937365

Just WHAT side are you going to give this money to? And why? To buy what?

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Greg Strandberg
Guest

Another thing to know about Crimea is that a lot of young people have no idea where it is or what it is.

This is a Baby Boomer issue, harkening back to Cold War sensibilities. That crap ended when I was in 3rd grade or so, thank God.

Please older generation, do not get us into another mess like you and your parents got us into for 50 years.

Thanks!

Mark Tokarski
Guest

There is a massive internal struggle for power there, mass resignations, mutinies, and refugees headed for Russia, all fearing the new Democracy given them by NED and NATO. All unreported here, of course, typical of coup d’état. new regime takes control of information.

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

test

Mark Tokarski
Guest

Did we pass?

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

In your case, D—-.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I’m sorry, craigy, but I must defer to YOUR party’s outstanding vice preziduncel candidate for some wisdom regarding our current crisis with Russia. The only question I have is where DO you guys find these people??

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers

Oh but here, HERE is your presidunce material! Great choice.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/985935/?autoplay=true

Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

My party is the birthday party. We don’t have candidates, only celebrants, cake, ice cream, and candles.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Remember when Obama gave Medvedev the “green light”? http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/26/romney-russia-is-our-number-one-geopolitical-foe/ QUOTE=== BLITZER: The president of the United States is in South Korea right now, had a meeting with the Russian leader Medvedev, and he was heard with an open mike – it’s always dangerous for these politicians or leaders to be talking near an open mike. He was heard saying this to Medvedev, the Russian president. Listen to this. BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility. DMITRY MEDVEDEV, RUSSIAN PRESIDENT: I understand you. I transmit this information to Vladimir,… Read more »

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */