What Does it Mean to Elect a ‘Military Man’?

Shares

Ryan Zinke’s aggressively pro-military Veterans day message contrasts pretty strongly with John Walsh’s much more subdued tone. Some of the comments responding to it, however, illustrated the ambivalence many liberals have towards voting for a candidate who has made a career out of the military. The balance between respect for veterans and their experience and a solid distrust for the military industrial complex occupied much of my mind during veterans day.

Samuel Johnson once said that ‘Every man thinks meanly of himself for not being a soldier’, and I must say that that’s been true in my case from time to time. Joining the military in my generation would have meant accepting George W. Bush as my Commander in Chief. I don’t mean to sound arrogant, but even as a teenager I understood the world and international politics better than Bush, Cheney, or Rumsfeld appeared to have at the time they invaded Iraq. But at the same time, those of us who never served have to wonder – if we had believed in the fight and in our commander, would we have exhibited the same bravery, commitment and sacrifice as those who did serve and still are serving? The only people who can answer this question with certainty are those who actually served, and that is why they continue to earn the respect and admiration even of the vast majority of those who opposed the wars they fought in. For this reason I have to respect Ryan Zinke’s service of his country – so I hope he had a happy veterans day and allowed himself a break from patriotic rage long enough to enjoy himself a bit.

But I don’t think that Zinke, or any military commander, has any exceptional skills or qualities that make them inherently better politicians or leaders. Commanding a unit in the military can hardly be compared to being a political leader – indeed, unlike the military or a corporation, in politics (especially the legislative branch) one rarely gets to give unquestioned orders (indeed, the chain of command in politics is neither clear nor simple), and clearly undergoing military operations around the world is not the same as studying and understanding foreign policy in those places.

The opposite question has also been raised – can a man who has devoted his career to the military be a reliable progressive? This question is obviously relevant in the case of Gen. John Walsh, but comes up periodically whenever officers in the military consider political careers (Gen. Wesley Clark comes to mind). I understand the concerns voiced by some about military politicians, but I think that neither history nor present-day politics bear them out. The previous administration showed amply that jingoistic civilians are no less bellicose than military leaders, and indeed seem on occasion to use aggressive military language and policy to compensate for their own lack of military service and the ‘meanness’ it causes in their self image. On the contrary, I think a progressive or moderate military candidate ought to be embraced – first, because the biggest impact Congress has on the military is on funding, and we’ve reached the absurd point where the civilians are trying to spend money on things the military doesn’t even want.. Having a distinguished military officer on the side of reason in military budget debates, no less than on foreign policy debates, may well blunt the ever-effective criticism that Democrats, progressives, or disguised communists are trying to, in the words of Ryan Zinke, “undermine America’s heroesª.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

The Polish Wolf

13
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
7 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
The Polish WolfLarry Kralj, Environmental RangersLongtime RezTrust No OnePublius II Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
James Conner
Guest

“Commanding a unit in the military can hardly be compared to being a political leader – indeed, unlike the military or a corporation, in politics (especially the legislative branch) one rarely gets to give unquestioned orders (indeed, the chain of command in politics is neither clear nor simple)…”

Effective officers and noncoms lead by inspiring as well as by commanding. Many outstanding officers have formidable political skills, Eisenhower being just one example. When I was active in the Sierra Club some years ago, I found that many of my most effective volunteer leaders were active and retired military careerists.

The Polish Wolf
Guest
The Polish Wolf

Fair enough point, but I think there’s a big difference here – Eisenhower was an effective president without having served as a legislator. The skills of administration and legislation are different – Generals, presidents, and managers can all lead by inspiration. It is very difficult to legislate by inspiration. Not that military experience isn’t useful – but I don’t think it endows one with unparalleled legislative skills.

Norma Duffy
Guest

Around 64 % of all our presidents served in the military. A majority until George Bush served honorably and did the country no harm. I see nothing wrong with an Ex Military guy who has served running for senator.

Norma Duffy
Guest

Lets not forget Zinke is a lot like Sarah Palin, he quit because he was gonna get sent packing. Big difference from regarding honorably serving our country without ripping it off!

Trust No One
Guest
Trust No One

Zinke wasn’t ‘sent packing’, he received an honorable discharge. If you’re referring to the travel voucher fraud that happened around 1996 and he didn’t retire until 2006. That said, I don’t want him elected to any office I’m just getting a little tired of unsubstantiated crap and innuendo people are throwing around.

Norma Duffy
Guest

so you think that happen only on 1996? Really?

Pete Talbot
Guest
Pete Talbot

Good post, PW. I didn’t have to serve — my lottery number didn’t come up before the Vietnam War ended, thank God — but I have respect for those who did. I share your concern, though, about supporting career military candidates for national office. How are they going to vote on defense issues, particularly funding? Or security issues, like domestic spying? Or whistle-blowing activities? That being said, I believe that, to date, Walsh is the best candidate to take on Daines. I’d love to see a truly progressive candidate in the running, but that hasn’t happened. And this is Montana,… Read more »

Publius II
Guest
Publius II

Five Start General and Commander-in-Chief Eisenhower warned us about the Military-Industrial (Ike included Congressional in his draft but didn’t put that in his televised farewell) Complex, which our Founders would consider the ‘Standing Army’ they warned about over two hundred years ago. John Walsh started out as an enlisted man, and commanding the National Guard is a very broad task, and includes support of local governments and a variety of tasks. I also note there were extreme REPUBLICANS who fought the implementation of the GI Bill after WWII, and that legislation was a huge positve game-changer for all of America,… Read more »

Longtime Rez
Guest

Cogent reflection, P W. Military service cannot merely be a political credential any more than attending medical school means you’ll be a natural CEO. Residents of Minnesota all know how to repair snowmobiles. TV-watching makes you a better driver. I’ve found those who have a “military crush,” harbor childish and unrealistic notions about the military. They think being a good military leader means you get to order people about. There are a lot of deplorable wannabes, so hubris doesn’t have to wear a uniform. In my experience, actual veterans are very modest and don’t suppose their military experience automatically qualifies… Read more »

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers

“I’ve found those who have a “military crush,” harbor childish and unrealistic notions about the military.” Very well-written post, Rez. I was going to post, but you’ve don’t a very nice job. I find the endless glorification of the military to be very un-American. We are MORE than Ramboesque bullshit! So, these a**holes who endlessly spout this patriotic nonsense and equate patriotism with military service make me puke! I think that Mohammed Ali was MUCH more of a patriot than any of the little pissant flag wavers! The glorification of the military has resulted in unbelievable carnage and needless death… Read more »

Longtime Rez
Guest

Before you move on entirely, PW, it would be good to hear your reflections on the modern military. The loss of the draft meant the representative nature of our military dissipated. Not that I believe for even a nanosecond that gunfire solves problems, the presence of young people rationally opposing a war presents an army that contains the same dissonance present in the civilian society it serves. The war in Vietnam ended because the ranks could see it for the expensive and ineffectual bureaucracy it was. Oh, for a military that asks itself if war is worth it. Dissent is… Read more »

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */