Is Ryan Zinke Still Working for Neil Livingstone?

Shares

While it’s unlikely anyone in the media will ask Ryan Zinke why he ran as Neil Livingstone’s running mate in 2012, given Livingstone’s penchant for making claims about waterboarding and prostitution, reporters might want to ask themselves why Zinke and Livingstone are still so closely connected to each other.

Last week, after Mr. Zinke’s terribly convincing departure from his personal Super PAC Special Operations for America, the organization named a new chairman, Gary Stubblefield.

Interestingly enough, it seems Mr. Stubblefield is doing two jobs, as he is listed as the “Executive Vice President, Risk Management” for Neil Livingstone’s Executive Action, LLC. You might recall that, according to reporting from Tim Murphy at Mother Jones, Executive Action is an incredibly shady company involved in doing work for both the families of dictators and a terrorist organization:

Although he refrains from speaking publicly about his clients, a 2007 lawsuit initiated by GlobalOptions revealed that his new firm represented the daughter of Uzbekistan dictator Islam Karimov, as well as the family of Viacom mogul Sumner Redstone. Through Executive Action, Livingstone sponsored a panel to boost the MEK, an Iranian dissident group—and alleged cult—that the US considers a terrorist organization. “There are a few cultlike aspects to them,” he told The New Yorker’s Connie Bruck, “but I like them because they bug Iran.”

Maybe Zinke only has three friends, or perhaps he’s just a little too closely linked to people like Neil Livingstone. Given that Special Operations for America has largely operated as a piggy bank for Zinke and his friends, it will be interesting to see if any money flowed towards Executive Action, LLC in the past year.

In his nascent campaign, Zinke repeatedly refers to the idea of trust. I wonder exactly how Montana voters are supposed to trust someone who’s not only been willing to run with perhaps the looniest candidate in recent Montana history, but who continues to have a relationship with him and his organization.

And there’s more to come…

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
LynnLarry Kralj, Environmental RangersDon PogrebaClark Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Clark
Guest
Clark

Is the headline intentional?

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers

Yes. It’s Ebonics.

It’s actually the subjunctive.

I be bad.
You be bad.
He be bad.
We be bad.
They be bad.

What? Doesn’t make sense? Here, allow me to explain.

It’s important that you BE on time!

See how it works?

It’s important that you be bad.

Yes, Clark, the English has a subjunctive.

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */