Some of the Best Writing Following the Zimmerman Verdict

Shares

Ta-Nehisi Coates:

The injustice inherent in the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman was not authored by a jury given a weak case. The jury’s performance may be the least disturbing aspect of this entire affair. The injustice was authored by a country which has taken as its policy, for the lionshare of its history, to erect a pariah class. The killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman is not an error in programming. It is the correct result of forces we set in motion years ago and have done very little to arrest.

David Simon:

If I were a person of color in Florida, I would pick up a brick and start walking toward that courthouse in Sanford. Those that do not, those that hold the pain and betrayal inside and somehow manage to resist violence — these citizens are testament to a stoic tolerance that is more than the rest of us deserve.  I confess, their patience and patriotism is well beyond my own.

Behold, the lewd, pornographic embrace of two great American pathologies:  Race and guns, both of which have conspired not only to take the life of a teenager, but to make that killing entirely permissible.  I can’t look an African-American parent in the eye for thinking about what they must tell their sons about what can happen to them on the streets of their country.  Tonight, anyone who truly understands what justice is and what it requires of a society is ashamed to call himself an American.

Aura Bogado:

Media on the left, right and center have been fanning the flames of fear-mongering, speculating that people—and black people especially—will take to the streets. That fear-mongering represents a deep white anxiety about black bodies on the streets, and echoes Zimmerman’s fears: that black bodies on the street pose a public threat. But the real violence in those speculations, regardless of whether they prove to be true, is that it silences black anxiety. The anxiety that black men feel every time they walk outside the door—and the anxiety their loved ones feel for them as well. That white anxiety serves to conceal the real public threat: that a black man is killed every twenty-eight hours by a cop or vigilante.

Matthew Rothschild:

Had the roles been reversed, had an adult black man pursued and then killed a white teenager in the street, you can bet a million dollars that the verdict would have been different. The simple, stark fact is that we don’t have equal justice in America today, 50 years after the March on Washington. What we have instead is a system of justice that is racist to the core.

Racist in who gets arrested.

Racist in who gets charged, and with what.

Racist in who gets convicted.

And racist in the sentencing.

Scott Lemieux:

Carrying a deadly weapon in public should carry unique responsibilities. In most cases someone with a gun should not be able to escape culpability if he initiates a conflict with someone unarmed and the other party ends up getting shot and killed. Under the current law in many states, people threatened by armed people have few good options, because fighting back might create a license to kill. As the New Yorker‘s Amy Davidson puts it, “I still don’t understand what Trayvon was supposed to do.”

Unless the law is changed to deal with the large number of people carrying concealed guns, there will be more tragic and unnecessary deaths of innocent people like Trayvon Martin for which nobody is legally culpable.

Cord Jefferson:

Trayvon Martin is dead—and so many young men like him are dead or in prison—because in America it was his responsibility to take it. It was his responsibility to let a stranger with a gun follow him at night in his own neighborhood and suspect him of wrongdoing. It was his responsibility to apologize for being a black kid who scared people. It was not George Zimmerman’s responsibility to let a boy get home to his family.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

7
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Big JohanssonTurnerDon PogrebaCraig MooreLarry Kralj, Environmental Rangers Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers
Guest
Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers

Unbelievable verdict. But HEY, the good thing is that there is no racial element at all. And it’s a good thing that George murderman isn’t black, otherwise twelve angry minutes later, he be in jail for life! Just like this woman, for whom the jury deliberated a full twelve minutes! Seems reasonable to me!

http://ideas.time.com/2012/04/30/where-was-stand-your-ground-for-marissa-alexander/

Big Johansson
Guest
Big Johansson
Craig Moore
Guest
Craig Moore

Regarding who’s civil rights were violated, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz expressed his thoughts as to why the Florida prosecutor should be disbarred. http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/07/15/alan-dershowitz-supports-doj-civil-rights-investigation-of-special-prosecutor-angela-corey/ Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz says a civil rights case in the Zimmerman trial is in order, but not against George Zimmerman. Appearing on Fox’s Huckabee show over the weekend, Dershowitz says Florida special prosecutor Angela Corey is the one who violated an individual’s civil rights in this case. “What she did is she filed a false affidavit before the judge in order to get a second degree murder charge,” Dershowitz said, “failed to tell the… Read more »

Turner
Guest
Turner

I keep hearing that Montana has a Stand Your Ground law. Can someone show that law to me? I see that there’s a law reflecting the Castle Doctrine, which allows someone to use lethal force “to prevent a forcible felony” in his home or in some other “occupied structure.”

But which Montana law allows someone to use deadly force out in public when he perceives himself, correctly or not, to be in danger?

Big Johansson
Guest
Big Johansson

In MT “castle” could mean in the vicinity of a Billings Walmart.

http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/walmart-shooter-won-t-face-charges/article_e8a94e66-16c6-11df-99a9-001cc4c002e0.html

Echos of Florida with out the racial component.

Support Our Work!

Poll

What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */