Rehberg and Tester on Lobbyists


In a political world so often dominated by talking points written and delivered by surrogates, it’s too rare to be able to compare candidates directly based on their own words. When it comes to lobbyists, let’s compare what Tester and Rehberg have to say.

My apologies for not sourcing Mr. Tester’s remarks, but the journalist who clipped it from another reporter’s interview didn’t give credit for it. From Senator Tester:

From Represenative Rehberg:

And again:

Of course, Representative Rehberg should be a bit more concerned about the lobbyists he associates with, because in the past he’s found himself associating with the kind of person who ends up in prison.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

Leave a Reply

3 Comment threads
6 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
Mal GillsMark Tokarskilarry kurtzDon Pogrebarls4568 Recent comment authors
Notify of
Mark Tokarski

How you can draw distinctions between the two candidates based on thirty-second ads put out by one is remarkable testimony to the power of advertising as a psychologically manipulative force, in your case reinforcing your preexisting prejudices. Any person can give advice to an office holder. What Tester fails to mention is that the only means of access to him to offer advice is by means of campaign contributions. Legal bribes buy access, and “advice” carries weight because of the money and power behind it. (Example: Environmental groups opposing FJRA were not consulted in advance and were ridiculed after introduction.… Read more »


It’s not the lobbyist information that is the problem. It’s their contributions, fundraisers, and bundling tied to pro quid pro votes.

Picking lobbyist influence as a differential point between Rehberg and Tester is a really bad way to help your candidate.


I agree that there is not much oint in comparing lobbyist donations. It is a fact of life these days that one can’t compete for a national race without this kind of money. Too bad, really. And 30 second ads don’t tell anyone a thing. I have voted for 47 year now and have always tried to be responsible about it. My conclusions are that a person’s character is really pretty abvious from the start. Who lies, who does not. Who steals and who does not. Who cheats on his wife, who does not. Who exagerates the facts and who… Read more »

Mark Tokarski

Indeed, fear of the other party has proven to be a viable strategy to keep voting citizens from questioning the Coke/Pepsi choices we are given. Obama’s people know full well, for example, that you are dissatisfied with him, but also know you are so afraid of Republicans that you’ll vote for him no matter what.

Consider now and then that you’re being played.

larry kurtz

Control the federal bench, Dems.

Mal Gills

Easy decision given Coke’s spending habits. Also, you’ve no place speaking for anybody’s satisfaction.

Mark Tokarski

I generally don’t speak for anyone’s satisfaction. It’s election season, and that is all anyone is thinking about. It’s like a city where all the porch lights have been turned off. No one is home.

Support Our Work!


What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */