Dennis Rehberg Supports the Cancer Lobby


One of the early themes of the 2012 Senate race between Representative Rehberg and Senator Tester was the level of support each has shown in his career when it comes to cancer prevention and treatment. While Rehberg seemed only able to muster a family member (and not any votes) to demonstrate his commitment to fighting the disease, he’s unquestionably the leader of the Montana delegation when it comes to promoting carcinogens.

Nick Kristof, in the New York Times, makes it clear that Rehberg put corporate lobbyists ahead of public health, accurate science, and even the democratic process:

The American Chemistry Council first got its pals in Congress to order a $1 million follow-up study on formaldehyde and styrene. Then it demanded, through a provision drafted by Representative Denny Rehberg, a Montana Republican, that no money be spent on another Report on Carcinogens until the follow-up was completed — meaning a four-year delay until the next report. Stay tuned for an industry effort to slip some such provision into the next budget legislation.

Let’s be clear. There is uncertainty about toxic chemicals, and it is perfectly legitimate to criticize the Report on Carcinogens. But this effort to defund the report is an insult to science and democracy alike.

Kristof’s story isn’t new. It broke in the national news back in August, thanks to the reporting of Mother Jones.

Rehberg’s failure in the war against cancer isn’t new, either. In 2011, the American Cancer Society condemned his proposed amendment which would have immunized “the tobacco industry against many FDA regulations preventing them from making tobacco more addictive and marketing it to children.”

And we all remember Rehberg voting to cut screening for breast cancer.

Now, as I often note, I am not a reporter, but it seems that simply the fact that the New York Times, the Economist, Mother Jones, and the American Cancer Society have criticized our sole Representative for his wrong-headed moves in the fight against cancer warrants some news coverage.  Perhaps the press might need to pull someone off covering a political rally with fewer than 50 attendees to do the story, but I think the Montana electorate needs to know what Rehberg thinks about cancer more than they need to know what Chris Christie thinks of Jon Tester.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Matthew KoehlerNorma Duffy (@Ilikewoods) Recent comment authors
Notify of
Norma Duffy (@Ilikewoods)
Norma Duffy (@Ilikewoods)

I have been saying this myself. Good article Don. A lot of this hullabaloo has to do with fracking. They do not want Americans to know the chemical compounds they are putting next to our water supplies are dangerous. Denny seems to care a lot more for chemicals companies Koch Owns, then protecting Montanans or Americans.

Matthew Koehler
Matthew Koehler

So does that mean that Senator Tester supports the Lead-poisoning Lobby? For Immediate Release, September 20, 2012 Contact: Bill Snape, (202) 536-9351 Senate Poised to Vote on Bill Outlawing Lead-poisoning Protections for Wildlife WASHINGTON— The U.S. Senate is poised to vote on a controversial bill that would bar the Environmental Protection Agency from stepping in to protect hundreds of wildlife species that are killed or poisoned each year by lead hunting ammunition and lead fishing tackle. The provision is part of a bill, S. 2525, sponsored by Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.). “It’s a national disgrace that eagles, condors, loons and… Read more »

Support Our Work!


What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */