Education Montana Politics

Do You Want Neil Livingstone or Ken Miller Running Your School?

Shares

It became clear during the last legislative session that conservative talk about local control of schools was nothing more than talk, as they tried to impose their narrow view about curriculum on the entire state. Not content to leave the experience of conservative hypocrisy to the likes of  Representative Kris Hansen, gubernatorial candidates Ken Miller and Neil Livingstone recently let the North and South Valley Pachyderms in Victor know just how radical their views on education are.

As Ravalli Republic reporter Whitney Bermes notes both candidates made it clear they’re hostile to health education and local control of schools.

Miller opened up, claiming that public schools in Montana teach “pornographic education to kindergarteners” and that we need entirely reform education in Montana, focusing on charter schools.

Ignoring the fiscal irresponsibility of suggesting more schools when many are already struggling with declining enrollment and a concomitant lack of resources, Miller’s assertion that teachers are exposing children to pornography is the rhetoric of someone both ignorant about the work teachers do and profoundly disrespectful of their professionalism.

I’ll also suggest that Mr. Miller’s fixation on pornography and children says a great deal more about his psyche than it does about Montana’s teachers.

Not to be outdone, super-spy Neil Livingstone showed that he understands  democracy in Montana about as well as he does in Libya, claiming that teacher unions control school board elections in Helena, presumably so that they can teach sex ed instead of history:

livingstone

While I know Mr. Livingstone hasn’t lived in Montana long enough to understand how school board elections work, they’re the same here as in the rest of the state: one person, one vote—and the people of Helena resoundingly rejected the anti-health argument Livingstone and other conservatives advanced.

Given that Mr. Livingstone has such a limited knowledge of how government works in Montana, I’d suggest that he, not the education system, needs to emphasize civics education.

Montana has a proud tradition of local control of schools. It’s enshrined in our Constitution for many reasons, not the least of which is the danger of ideologues trying to dictate their values from the governor’s chair.

Neither of these two has any chance of becoming Montana’s governor, but voters should be wary of a party determined to undermine the idea that local communities can provide the education that’s best for their kids.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is a eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.

His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.

In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it’s a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

7 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

  • I don’t know Neil Livingstone, but Ken Miller is a friend of mine, and he would do an outstanding job of running our schools – much better than Gov BS

  • Eric, what was ken miller’s degree in again? Oh geez, I forgot. The dude never even WENT to college. Yet according to you, he’s a fine person to head up the education establishment here in Montana. Well, no he’s not. We don’t need another judy mars type person in the office. Judy thought all we needed was HOME schools. At the very least, a college degree is should be a requirement for running for guv. But you Pubbies think that any old moron will do. Sorry, but we TRIED that.

    p.s. Schweitzer has a master’s in soil science, and he has put his degree to good use. He understands better than anyone the value and importance of education. ken miller hasn’t a clue.

  • Hi there, just became aware of your weblog through Google, and found that it’s genuinely informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous folks are going to be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • I’d assume this has to be some form of evolutionary trait to determine what type of individual someone is. Whether they are out to get vengence, if they are different, a foe and dangerous. People would would need this knowledge how to deal to them.

%d bloggers like this: