Republicans pushing war or terror again…


In 2004, there was a video released somewhere about the “citizen media” on the Internet comparing the number of times that Osama Bin Laden was mentioned compared to Saddam Hussein at the 2004 Republican Convention.  It was quite telling that almost all of the speakers spent most of their time pushing the war and Iraq and not talking about the general war on terror and the all-but-forgotten war in Afghanistan.

Now two years later, the war is going horribly and Republicans are having problems staying on message.  One minute you get Republicans trashing Democratic candidates by suggesting they are “cutting and running,” the next there is aggressive discussion about a time table.

As you might expect, those folks making decisions in dark, smoked-filled rooms have figured out that Iraq isn’t a good message.  So, according to the Christian Science Monitor, it’s time for a healthy dose of the war on terror again.

The arrests in Britain of the refreshment-bombers mean we’re going to hear about how important it is to keep Republicans around.  Good times.

What I find amusing about this is that two years ago, you couldn’t find anyone in the right that wanted to talk about the war on terror and Iraq as different issues: it was all the same to them.  My guess is that they will finally make a distinction this election cycle.

If you appreciate our efforts to hold Montana Republicans accountable and the independent journalism here at The Montana Post, please consider supporting our work with a small pledge.

About the author


Leave a Reply

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Pogie Recent comment authors
Notify of
Don Pogreba

Seems like a great strategy. Of course, if we were actually winning Bush’s war, it might make a better strategy. 🙂

Support Our Work!


What would be the most appropriate nickname for Matt Rosendale?

Follow Us on Twitter

Subscribe Via E-mail

0 /* ]]> */